family-impact-institute-logo

Housing is a foundational aspect of life for an individual or a family. Safe and stable housing increases the likelihood of positive life experiences: physically, mentally, educationally, and vocationally. But it is increasingly unattainable. Middle-income renters (earning $35K–$75K) have seen the largest cost burden increases since 2000, making ownership increasingly out of reach. The affordability gap is widening, with homes being built for high-income transplants and second homeowners while lower- and moderate-income buyers are priced out, remaining in rentals longer. And, these trends differ by race and ethnicity.

Home Needs Differ by Region and Household

A few key factors influence affordability of a given area:

  1. Variety of products in supply: Condos, smaller homes, or older stock may be more affordable.
  2. Availability of deed-restricted housing: Homes with resale price or occupancy restrictions to maintain affordability.
  3. Distance from high-growth centers can mean lower prices—but proximity to growing areas can still drive variation within a region (e.g., some submarkets are more expensive than others).

Different households require different homes. Consider the unique needs of the variety of households, such as families with children, those who work remotely, and those who have physical challenges.

Policy Options

In the same way that housing challenges and needs vary by regions and demographics, effective policy directions differ depending on the community. Research shows effective levers in both home development and tailoring the market to needs.

Important Home Development Policy Levers Include:

  • Zoning that considers unique housing needs and market demand
  • Resources for housing development projects
    • Raise and dedicate funds
    • Produce and/or subsidize publicly assisted housing
    • Consider repurposing underutilized property; donating publicly owned land
  • Align housing growth goals and incentives with employment growth goals and incentives.

Effective policy and programmatic levers tailor to market, submarket, and disproportionate needs:

Own Rent
High Priced Markets

Goal = Homeownership

  • Deed-restricted homeownership products
  • Planned workforce communities
  • Privately owned land
    • SFDs: attached homes; smaller homes; prohibit second use
    • Incentives to redevelop underutilized land
  • Publicly owned land
    • Seasonal workforce campground communities
    • Incentives to develop vacant land
    • Housing land trusts
Goal = rental stability

  • Publicly subsidized and owned rental communities
  • Targeted rental assistance
Moderate Priced Markets Goal = Homeownership and Wealth Building

  • SFDs: Allowing attached homes under certain parameters
  • Greenfield or redevelopments with a wide range of product types
  • Downpayment subsidies
    • Target lower income brackets
    • Aligning with wages of workforce and historically excluded residents
  • Privately owned land
    • SFDs: attached homes; smaller homes
    • Incentives to redevelop underutilized and vacant land
Goal = Save for homeownership

  • Increase supply for multifamily housing. Slight increases in vacancy rates brings down rents
    • Expected when homeownership increases!
  • Expand where homes are built
    • Light commercial zones
    • Religious sites
  • Targeted rental assistance

Policy Implications and Actions

To address Colorado’s housing challenges, solutions must be market-specific, equity-driven, and creatively leverage local authority. Supporting renters today means more affordable homeownership—and stability—tomorrow.

Key Information

Seminar Website
Family Impact Seminars

More Seminars
Family Impact Seminars

Publication Date
April 17, 2025

Topic Area(s)
Social Services

Resource Type
Written Briefs

Share This Page

Housing is a foundational aspect of life for an individual or a family. Safe and stable housing increases the likelihood of positive life experiences: physically, mentally, educationally, and vocationally. But it is increasingly unattainable. Middle-income renters (earning $35K–$75K) have seen the largest cost burden increases since 2000, making ownership increasingly out of reach. The affordability gap is widening, with homes being built for high-income transplants and second homeowners while lower- and moderate-income buyers are priced out, remaining in rentals longer. And, these trends differ by race and ethnicity.

Home Needs Differ by Region and Household

A few key factors influence affordability of a given area:

  1. Variety of products in supply: Condos, smaller homes, or older stock may be more affordable.
  2. Availability of deed-restricted housing: Homes with resale price or occupancy restrictions to maintain affordability.
  3. Distance from high-growth centers can mean lower prices—but proximity to growing areas can still drive variation within a region (e.g., some submarkets are more expensive than others).

Different households require different homes. Consider the unique needs of the variety of households, such as families with children, those who work remotely, and those who have physical challenges.

Policy Options

In the same way that housing challenges and needs vary by regions and demographics, effective policy directions differ depending on the community. Research shows effective levers in both home development and tailoring the market to needs.

Important Home Development Policy Levers Include:

  • Zoning that considers unique housing needs and market demand
  • Resources for housing development projects
    • Raise and dedicate funds
    • Produce and/or subsidize publicly assisted housing
    • Consider repurposing underutilized property; donating publicly owned land
  • Align housing growth goals and incentives with employment growth goals and incentives.

Effective policy and programmatic levers tailor to market, submarket, and disproportionate needs:

Own Rent
High Priced Markets

Goal = Homeownership

  • Deed-restricted homeownership products
  • Planned workforce communities
  • Privately owned land
    • SFDs: attached homes; smaller homes; prohibit second use
    • Incentives to redevelop underutilized land
  • Publicly owned land
    • Seasonal workforce campground communities
    • Incentives to develop vacant land
    • Housing land trusts
Goal = rental stability

  • Publicly subsidized and owned rental communities
  • Targeted rental assistance
Moderate Priced Markets Goal = Homeownership and Wealth Building

  • SFDs: Allowing attached homes under certain parameters
  • Greenfield or redevelopments with a wide range of product types
  • Downpayment subsidies
    • Target lower income brackets
    • Aligning with wages of workforce and historically excluded residents
  • Privately owned land
    • SFDs: attached homes; smaller homes
    • Incentives to redevelop underutilized and vacant land
Goal = Save for homeownership

  • Increase supply for multifamily housing. Slight increases in vacancy rates brings down rents
    • Expected when homeownership increases!
  • Expand where homes are built
    • Light commercial zones
    • Religious sites
  • Targeted rental assistance

Policy Implications and Actions

To address Colorado’s housing challenges, solutions must be market-specific, equity-driven, and creatively leverage local authority. Supporting renters today means more affordable homeownership—and stability—tomorrow.

research-to-policy-logo

Key Information

Seminar Website
Family Impact Seminars

More Seminars
Family Impact Seminars

Publication Date
April 17, 2025

Resource Type
Written Briefs

Share This Page

Recent Family Impact Seminars

View and search all Family Impact Seminars HERE.

LET’S STAY IN TOUCH

Join the Evidence-to-Impact Mailing List

Keep up to date with the latest resources, events, and news from the EIC.