Making budget choices based on credible evidence that programs will generate a positive return on taxpayer investment is a key first step for policy makers seeking to improve government performance, but it is just as important to make certain that funded programs are implemented as designed. Strong quality assurance and outcome reporting systems can help ensure that programs achieve expected outcomes.
This issue brief serves as an instructive case study on the importance of quality assurance monitoring in juvenile justice programs in Washington state, which has led the way in using cutting-edge cost-benefit analysis to guide its budget and policy choices. Quality assurance has played a key role in helping the state save money and reduce by more than half the number of youth committed to state institutions while at the same time achieving a greater reduction in crime rates and juvenile arrest rates than the national average.
The Results First initiative, a project supported by The Pew Charitable Trusts and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, authored this publication.
Publication DateJuly 26, 2012
Read Time1 min
Results First Resources
Evidence-Based Policymaking Resource Center
Share This Page
Related Results First Resources
View and search all Results First Resources HERE.
Inventory of programs provides a tool to map their implementation across continuum of care
June 5, 2020
National evaluation tool helps assess what’s working well – and what can be improved
August 13, 2018
Evidence-based policymaking allows government leaders to achieve the best possible outcomes by investing in programs that have been rigorously studied and proved to work.
July 18, 2017
Training, implementation monitored to ensure evidence-based services achieve results
January 27, 2019
LET’S STAY IN TOUCH
Join the Evidence-to-Impact Mailing List
Keep up to date with the latest resources, events, and news from the EIC.